Throughout Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable, it becomes clear that the discrimination that the main
character Bahka faces each day is part of a greater theme of how oppression becomes cyclical. Anand
emphasizes the untouchables’ lack of ability to change their status in society.
They cannot get their own water, they must rely on the “generosity” of the
higher castes to draw them water from the well. They are not able to receive an
education because those who teach are afraid of being dirtied by the presence
of an untouchable in the classroom. Untouchables are even forced to pay higher
prices for goods, even though they are unable to be paid for their work and can
only be given “small gifts” from the higher class. The upper castes justify
their treatment of the untouchables by claiming their status is a form of
purgatory for bad acts in a past life. There is some truth to that thought:
yes, the untouchables are in purgatory (or really hell), but they are not
responsible for their placement there. Anand writes, “[Singh] did not relax the
grin which symbolized six thousand years of racial and class superiority,”
(10). The status of the untouchables is not something they can change and with
no way for their children to escape it either, they are essentially stuck in a
life of misery. It is somewhat ironic that while many believed that it was the
past that caused the untouchables to be where they are, it is this very same
status that prevents any type of future for them. Anand’s novel seems relevant
even today in American society. While not as blatant in our eyes as the blight
of Bakha, millions of Americans face the same cycle that Bakha does. The systematic
oppression in our country prevents marginalized groups from receiving equal
education, equal pay, and equal treatment. What does this say about our country
when we can draw parallels from a novel written in 1935 about a developing country?
Sunday, January 29, 2017
Untouchable and Social Change
Throughout history, works of literature have been major
components of the fight for social change. From Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin to Kate Chopin’s The Awakening to Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, published
“radical” works have been a catalyst for progress. Untouchable by Mulk Raj Anand is another example of such works.
Written in 1935 during the time of Gandhi’s fight for Indian independence and
the abolishing of untouchability, the novel explores the horrors of the Indian
caste system. While the caste system still remains today and many rigidly
adhere to its rules, since the publication of Untouchable, numerous equality-minded laws have been established in
India. The novel forced many to think about the society they lived in. The book follows the day in the life of
Bakha, a member of the untouchable caste. He works cleaning up human waste and
his life is filled with filth and hardship. Throughout his day, he his treated
awfully by members of higher castes. Through the story, Anand creates a
compelling case for change in Indian society. The only character who treats
Bakha kindly is Charat Singh who allows Bakha to touch his personal items,
something that many would have thought “soiled” the goods. Singh represents
forward thinking and the ability fof evolution in belief and thought. While Singh at the
beginning of the novel wakes Bakha to clean the latrines for him, he eventually
evolves to treating Bakha if not as an equal, at least as a human being. Singh symbolizes Anand’s hope for India and
mimicks the change he hopes to see on a national rather than just a personal
level. Literature is meant to leave a reader thinking long after they finish.
Anand does just this with Untouchable.
The books causes readers to explore their own caste systems they are living in,
whether it is India in 1935 or America in 2017.
Sunday, January 22, 2017
How Literature Has Shaped Me (In response to "C.S. Lewis on Why We Read")
When asked in a college interview the other day what my
favorite thing is (the interviewer clarified she kept it vague on purpose), I
responded with “I guess my favorite thing is also my least favorite. You know
that feeling when you are about to finish a really great book, and it is
amazing because you have gone on this great journey and it is all about to come
together, but it is also sad because it usually means saying goodbye to
characters that you have connected with and our now in an odd way a type of
friend? Yeah, that’s my favorite thing.” I am sure she thought I was a little
crazy as a I rambled on, but she laughed and admitted that while the feeling
was new to her, she did understand. I have always loved to read and I think
books are something I have taken for granted in my life. While I found stories
to be a way for me to escape, throwing myself into places like the halls of
Hogwarts and Margaret Mitchell’s antebellum South, I never really stopped to
consider how books have shaped who I am today. Literature has given me access
to not only a thousand different worlds, but also a thousand different
perspectives. C.S. Lewis said, “… in reading literature I become a thousand men
and yet remain myself.” Reading has provided me with a way to discover myself
in different contexts. It has helped me to understand my own privilege as I
look through the life lenses of those who are oppressed. Facts and figures are
one form of understanding, but by being able to put a person to those
statistics, as literature does, readers are able to feel the emotions of an
identity they may never hold. Writers walk the fine line of creating characters
that are relatable, while also not having them hold all the same backgrounds.
The avoidance of the “single story,” as Chimamanda Adichie puts it, is
critical, but readers also must be able to engage with the characters and find
common ground. In a way, they must be able to put themselves in the shoes of
the character. It is in this way that the ability to empathize with those who
are different than ourselves is developed, and that is the first step to
equality. Reading has pushed me to better myself, not only academically but
also personally. Through reading the works of a diverse group of authors, I
continue to strive to broaden my view of our world and society one page at a
time.
Response to "Chinua Achebe on How Storytelling Helps Us Survive History’s Rough Patches"
While over twenty years old, Chinua Achebe’s ideas in his
interview with Bill Moyers seem more relevant than ever. Achebe remarks, “There
is no one way to anything.” In a country where fake new has quickly become an
epidemic, and ignorance and a lack of empathy the newest intellectual fashion,
Achebe makes a point that too few people are aware of: in our society we become
so closed off in our own life bubbles that we forget that someone else is
experiencing our world through a very different lens. Literature is a way to
give readers a way to gain a different perspective of society, but only when
authors are willing to pen the story of an “unconventional” (or rather not a
white, straight, cisgender, able-bodied, and upper-middle class) character.
Achebe then goes on to say that it is vital to be political in writing. As I
have continued my academic schooling, it has become increasingly clear that history
books tell only one story that are easily forgotten. Books are a way to ensure
that the untold stories, usually not romantic or pretty, are there to remind
and warn new generations of the past and prevent history from repeating itself
over and over again. It takes courage for writers to a chance and create an
unsettling piece. I firmly believe that literature is meant to leave readers
questioning not only the world around them, but also themselves and their own
beliefs. In the interview, Achebe also offers a glimmer of hope. He reminds
readers that by exploring only a small period of history, the bad seems
overpowering, but viewed in the larger context of human history it is simply a
“bad-patch.” As someone who has sometimes viewed the last year as the start of
a seemingly terminal illness for the United States, Achebe has provided me with
a reason to be optimistic for the future. It is easy to become caught up in the
terrible, that we forget that our mothers, fathers, grandparents,
great-grandparents, and so on have endured so much worse and have come out the
other side. Our society has a huge responsibility to ourselves and each other
to continue to work for what is right, and literature is a key component in
this fight.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)