Whether or not to publish the private works of an author
that has passed is a complex question. It calls morals into question and lines
become hazy and vague. One always wants to respect the wishes of a friend or
family member after their passing, but sometimes going against that wish can be
for the betterment of society. Take The
Diary of Young Girl by Anne Frank. I can confidently say that no teenage
girl wants her private diary to be published. Why? Because it is embarrassing.
However, does that embarrassment cease to exist when a human’s soul leaves this
earth? Anne Frank’s work has had a monumental impact globally. Many hide their
work from the world because it is “private” which can also been interpreted as
the author being scared. Franz Kafka suffered from self doubt most likely
derived from his father’s verbal abuse. He wanted all of his manuscripts to be
destroyed after his death, but his friend Max Brod decided to go against his
wishes and publish his works. While a betrayal, this gave the literary world
great works that are still studied today, nearly one hundred years later.
Personally, I believe that going against a dying wish can be justified, but not
always. Telling a family member that a loved one secretly despised them after
their passing or sharing a personal secret that will only cause harm is
unnecessary, but sharing a work that will benefit others seems appropriate.
Yes, the parallels between Kafka’s own life and the characters in his works,
especially Metamorphosis, are clear
and not very flattering regarding his parents, but the meanings and lessons
found in the works outweigh the negative impact on his family’s feelings. If
anything, seeing the torment that a father imposes on his son in a fictional
character may have caused Kafka’s father to reevaluate his own actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment